ENG 718-91: American Literature of the Sea
Summer Institute II
July 20-24, 2015
Meier Hall 249E
—
Click on the headings below to navigate the syllabus or download a PDF version here.
Contact Dr. RisamEmail me at rrisam [at] salemstate [dot] edu
This course will:
• Explore literatures of the Americas that negotiate the relationship between the ocean and human experience.
• Examine theoretical scholarship in oceanic studies.
• Facilitate dialogue between students to encourage understanding of how the ocean functions as a category of analysis in literary scholarship, complicating how we understand race, gender, sexuality, migration, and resistance.
• Introduce students to the field of digital humanities and its uses for literary studies.
• Engage students in hands-on practice in digital humanities.
1. Identify the ways that writers in literature of the Americas use the ocean to represent the complexities of lived experience.
2. Describe core concepts in oceanic theory.
3. Analyze how writers use tropes of water to engage with intersectional migrant identities and the possibilities of resistance against dominant political and ideological forces.
4. Use digital tools to engage with literary analysis.
5. Appraise the limits and affordances of the digital tools they use for literary study.
Maryse Condé’s I, Tituba: Black Witch of Salem (1986)
Charles Johnson’s Middle Passage (1990)
Patricia Powell’s The Pagoda (1998)
Le Thi Diem Thuy’s The Gangster We Are All Looking For (2003)
Amitav Ghosh’s Sea of Poppies (2008)
Novelty (available on password-protected download page here)
Emoji Dick, Herman Melville’s classic whale tale, as told by Japanese emoticons (Ch. 1-2)
Novella (available from Project Gutenberg)
Herman Melville’s “Benito Cereno” (1855)
Memoir (available from Project Gutenberg)
Olaudah Equiano’s The Narrative of the Interesting Life of Olaudah Equiano (1789) (Ch. 1-2)
Emily Kugler’s “Equiano’s English Subscribers List”
Film (available through NOBLE or Amazon Streaming)
Amistad (1997)
Music (available on YouTube)
Drexciya, “Aquarazorda” (1994)
Drexciya, “Dehydration” (1994)
Interview with Drexciya (00.00-4:30 minutes)
Philip Sherburne, “Drexciya: Journey of the Deep Sea Dweller”
Kodwo Eshun, “Drexciya: Fear of a Wet Planet”
Blum, Hester. “Introduction: Oceanic Studies.” Atlantic Studies 10.2 (2013): 151-55.
—. “The Prospect of Oceanic Studies.” PMLA 125.3 (May 2010): 670-677.
Cohen, Margaret. “Literary Studies on the Terraqueous Globe.” PMLA 125.3 (May 2010): 657-662.
Coulson, Douglas M. “Distorted Records in ‘Benito Cereno’ and the Slave Rebellion Tradition.” Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities 22.1 (2010): 1-34.
Crane, Jacob. “Beyond the Cape: Amitav Ghosh, Frederick Douglass, and the Limits of the Black Atlantic.” Postcolonial Text 6.4 (2011).
DeLoughrey, Elizabeth. “Heavy Waters: Waste and Atlantic Modernity.” PMLA 125.3 (May 2010): 703-12.
Dillon, Elizabeth Maddock. “A Sea of Texts: The Atlantic World, Spatial Mapping, and Equiano’s Narrative.” Religion and Space in the Atlantic World. Eds. John Corrigan, David Bodenhamer, and Trevor Harris. Bloomington, IN: Indiana UP, forthcoming. http://edillo4.wix.com/equiano-gis#!
Eckstein, Lars. “The Pitfalls of Picturing Atlantic Slavery: Steven Spielberg’s Amistad vs. Guy Deslaurier’s The Middle Passage.” Cultural Studies Review 10.1 (2008): 72-84.
Gilroy, Paul. “The Black Atlantic as a Counterculture of Modernity.” The Black Atlantic: Modernity and Double Consciousness. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1993. 1-40.
Hofmeyr, Isabel. “Universalizing the Indian Ocean.” PMLA 125.3 (May 2010): 721-729.
Matsuda, Matt K. “AHR Forum: The Pacific.” The American Historical Review 111.3 (2006): 758-780.
Warren, Lenora D. “Insurrection at Sea: Violence, the Slave Trade, and the Rhetoric of Abolition.” Atlantic Studies 10.2 (2013): 197-210.
Wilson, Rob. “Doing Cultural Studies Inside APEC: Literature, Cultural Identity, and Global/Local Dynamics in the American Pacific.” Comparative Literature 53.4 (Autumn 2001): 389-403.
Yaegar, Patricia. “Editor’s Column: Sea Trash, Dark Pools, and the Tragedy of the Commons.” PMLA 125.3 (May 2010): 523-545.
Participation
This seminar is discussion-driven, so active participation is required. You are expected to complete the reading for each day and come to class prepared to discuss it. You should plan on reading the assignments before the start of the institute so you can formulate substantive questions and comments that lead to productive class discussion. Given the volume of reading for the course, I have prepared a list of questions for you to consider to give your reading some focus. In addition to being an active participant in discussions, you may be asked to complete quick writing activities, explore digital projects, and participate in collaborative work on a digital project that we design together. All of this will be included in your participation, which will count for 50% of your final grade.
Leading Discussion
Each participant will be responsible for leading discussion on one literary text and two of the theoretical texts assigned. You will be given the opportunity to sign up for texts of your choice. As discussion leader, you are required to formulate questions that will shape our discussion of the text and guide our conversation on them. Please supply me with a copy of your questions, either on paper or via email. You do not need to give me questions in advance but I am happy to look over them if you wish. Leading discussion will count for 25% of your grade.
Digital Project and Reflection Paper
During the institute, we will be collaborating on a digital project based on Maryse Condé’s novel I, Tituba: Black Witch of Salem. This project will serve as the culminating experience for the course. Digital literary projects engage an array of skills including literary analysis, working with data, coding, and design. Creating a project together will allow us to not only share our common interest in literary study but also leverage and develop our other interests to engage in literature in new ways. You will notice that I have built in time on the institute schedule to introduce you to the field of digital humanities, familiarize you with tools for digital literary research, and allow you to explore and discuss existing digital scholarship. Based on these experiences, we will design and execute a project on Condé’s novel, which has relevance to both the theme of the course and our location in Salem, Mass. In the course of the institute, we will brainstorm, plan, and work together to create a project practically achievable in the scope of the class. At the conclusion of the institute, there will likely be additional independent work to complete the project and you will also write a 4-5 page, double-spaced reflection paper that describes your contribution to the project, what you learned from it, and the insights on Condé’s novel and Salem that you gleaned from your work. Your work on the project and reflection paper will count for 25% of your grade.
Digital project and reflection paper 25%
Participation 50%
All work you submit for this course must be your own. While I hope you will learn from your discussions with your classmates, you must ensure that every piece of writing you submit to me is written in your own words. Plagiarism will result in a grade of “0” for the assignment and could lead to additional consequences, including failing the course. If you have any questions about plagiarism, please contact me right away.